Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/TBP

Denial

FT2 tacitly admits to being User:TBP on an earlier version of his user page [1]. He brags "Created (or effectively rewritten) from scratch: [ ... ] Hani_Miletski ... Kenneth_Pinyan [ ... ]" Both were created and substantially written by TBP, with only minor input from the FT2 account[2]. ^[1] The contribution of the FT2 account was one sentence [3]. By contrast the TBP account created and expanded the article nearly into its present form [4]
Appears to admit it (Wikipedia Review) [5]
Avoids the question.
- Proabivouac: "FT2, for the third time: If User:TBP wasn't you, why did you take credit for his work?" FT2 replies: "TBP is his own topic. And I routinely let others take credit for work I significantly help with, or delicate posts I help them with wording, or disputes they aren't so sure how to approach, it's well known amongst both admin and non-admin users. I'll open that when I'm round next time (away today)." [6]
- Strange, because he wasn't letting TBP take credit for his work, rather, he was taking credit for TBP's work.
- PB - "Whom you allow to take credit for your work is completely irrelevant here, FT2. If TBP isn't you, you have wrongfully claimed his work as your own. In the real world, that's a much bigger deal than Wikipedia sockpuppetry." [7])
But denies the account was his, on his talk page [8].
TBP contributions to talk pages [9], see especially [10]

FT2 and TBP working one after another. FT2 mitigating bestial activities [11]
Working on the same section as FT2 at the same time: [12], [13]
Working on the same paragraph within the same 24 hours: [14]
FT2 using TBP to remove sourced information about the low IQ etc of zoophiles [15]
Pushing for normality of sexual attraction to animals (unsourced) [16]
Pushing for zoosexuality (another fringe way of normalizing bestiality): [17]
Working consequently on zoosadism article [18]
Working on the same line in Rainbow Bridge article [19], [20]
Working on the same issues of the emotion in animals article [21]
Working on the ethology article, one diff after another [22]
Working on FT2’s favorite pro-zoo researcher on the same sentence [23], [24]

More diffs one after another
- TPB makes a statement about being trained by top NLP promoters. [25]
- TBP giving FT2's reply: [26], [27], [28]
Defending TBP as a sockpuppet in the NLP discussion, but not admitting to sockpuppetry. [29]. He says "One editor, User:TBP, was explicitly self-identified as a sock puppet on his talk page before becoming involved in this article Oct 17 DIFF. He played no part in the vote or its discussion, and only a minor role in the talk page debate, mostly between Oct 27-29. "
Note the diff he refers to [30] is no longer available because an administrator has deleted the evidence.
FT2’s sockpuppetry continuing until FT2 is close to request for adminship: [31]

After FT2 has given Seus Hawkins a lecture, User:TBP turns up to reinforce the point. [32]
FT2 accuses User:Faxx of being a sock, and then follows it up with a comment from 'TBP'. [33]* TBP comments on FT2[34]
From the thread on Wikipedia Review [35]