Difference between revisions of "Croatian Identity"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday December 05, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Tanais Tablet)
m (fix plus)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
[[File:422px-Horovathos.jpg|thumb|right|125px|'''Tanais Tablet''' B containing the word Χοροάθος (Horoáthos).]]
 
[[File:422px-Horovathos.jpg|thumb|right|125px|'''Tanais Tablet''' B containing the word Χοροάθος (Horoáthos).]]
  
From the information above ''one'' can conclude that we are dealing with contact between Slavic and Sarmatian tribes from the late antiquity. From a modern day perspective the Sarmatian historical footprint is non existent. All traces of these people have disappeared other than Slavic terms surrounding the word or name Hrvat which translates to English as Croat. Radoslav Katicic a Croatian linguist (and a classical philologist, Indo-Europeanist, Slavist and Indologist) said that the names from the Tanais Tablet are personal and not national ones.<ref> [http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:Edm6Y5fDTZIJ:hrcak.srce.hr/file/35393+Χορούαθ%5Bος%5D,+Χοροάθος,+Χορόαθος&hl=en&gl=au&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgripbdhgQKsJ2lYYoKzGgb8IL443tai-onXZmQpWqi0BgUV2k7XDphPGLkrg9vsUuJuDA33oNos--Hdvk97rIB7XohsllJAB005pYwxhyU9dz_MW4qMJ8rhVgiomObnI9MpfKc&sig=AHIEtbQMR6JibFi1R8Osu3YuTtln0EKMfA Two Public Inscriptions from the Greek Colony of Tanais at the Mouth of the Don River on the Sea of Azov] by Ante Skegro (p.17)</ref> Furthermore it also could be said that these names are not related to any ethnic identity. Historically the term Croat became fully established as a constructed Identity by the 19th century.  
+
From the information above ''one'' can conclude that we are dealing with contact between Slavic and Sarmatian tribes from the late antiquity. From a modern day perspective the Sarmatian historical footprint is non existent. All traces of these people have disappeared other than Slavic terms surrounding the word or name Hrvat which translates to English as Croat. Radoslav Katicic a Croatian linguist (and a classical philologist, Indo-Europeanist, Slavist and Indologist) said that the names from the Tanais Tablet are personal and not national ones.<ref> [http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:Edm6Y5fDTZIJ:hrcak.srce.hr/file/35393+Χορούαθ%5Bος%5D,+Χοροάθος,+Χορόαθος&hl=en&gl=au&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgripbdhgQKsJ2lYYoKzGgb8IL443tai-onXZmQpWqi0BgUV2k7XDphPGLkrg9vsUuJuDA33oNos--Hdvk97rIB7XohsllJAB005pYwxhyU9dz_MW4qMJ8rhVgiomObnI9MpfKc&sig=AHIEtbQMR6JibFi1R8Osu3YuTtln0EKMfA Two Public Inscriptions from the Greek Colony of Tanais at the Mouth of the Don River on the Sea of Azov] by Ante Skegro (p.17)</ref> Furthermore it also could be said that these names are not related to any ethnic identity. Historically the term Croat became fully established as a ''constructed identity'' by the 19th century.  
  
 
'''Recent DNA Studies'''
 
'''Recent DNA Studies'''

Revision as of 07:06, 23 August 2011

Croatia (Hrvatska)

The first primary source, factual to mention the Croatian (Hrvat) identity in the Balkans was Duke Branimir (Latin: "Branimiro comite dux cruatorum cogitavit" c. 880 AD).[1][2] Duke Branimir was a Slav from Dalmatia.

A group of Slavic [3] tribes settled in the Dalmatian Hinterland (Roman Dalmatia). Ducatus Croatiae was created in the late 9th century which evolved from Dalmatian Ducatus which at the time was part of the Carolingian Empire - Franks. Later it became a kingdom which was called the Kingdom of Croatia (925–1102 AD).

The new Kingdom of Croatia (Regnum Chroatorum) was ruled by Slavic nobility from the Dalmatian hinterland. The kingdom was named after her ruling class, which in turn ruled a medieval multi-ethnic state. The term Slav was first used by the Byzantines-Eastern Roman Empire (i.e. Procopius-Byzantine scholar, Jordanes- 6th century Roman bureaucrat) and was recorded in the 6th century (cia. 550) in Greek (Σκλαβῖνοι-Sklabenoi). Later in Latin it was written Sclaveni.

Hrvat or Horoúathos are names of Sarmatian origins. In 1853 a Russian archaeologist Pavel Mikhailovich Leontjev discovered the Tanais Tablets. The Tanais Tablets mention three men: Horoúathos, Horoáthos, and Horóathos (Χορούαθ[ος], Χοροάθος, Χορόαθος). They are written in Greek and are from the 3rd century AD from the city of Tanais, today's Azov, Russia. At that time the region had a mixed Greek - Sarmatian population.[4]

Tanais Tablet B containing the word Χοροάθος (Horoáthos).

From the information above one can conclude that we are dealing with contact between Slavic and Sarmatian tribes from the late antiquity. From a modern day perspective the Sarmatian historical footprint is non existent. All traces of these people have disappeared other than Slavic terms surrounding the word or name Hrvat which translates to English as Croat. Radoslav Katicic a Croatian linguist (and a classical philologist, Indo-Europeanist, Slavist and Indologist) said that the names from the Tanais Tablet are personal and not national ones.[5] Furthermore it also could be said that these names are not related to any ethnic identity. Historically the term Croat became fully established as a constructed identity by the 19th century.

Recent DNA Studies

It is also very interesting to note that recent DNA studies have stated that more than three quarters of today's Croatian men are the descendants of Europeans who inhabited Europe 13 000-20 000 years ago.[6] From a DNA studies perspective, the peoples who were living in Roman Dalmatia (prior to the arrival of Slavic tribes) were genetically dominant and remain so to this day. The peoples who were living in Roman Dalmatia in that period predominately were of an Illyrian-Roman Latin population. [7]

Roman Dalmatia

The Roman province of Dalmatia (pink colour) in the Western Roman Empire. 476 AD

Slavic tribes invaded the region of Roman Dalmatia in the early Middle Ages. Prior to the arrival of the Slavs, Roman Dalmatia was mainly inhabited by a Roman Latin-Illyrian population. Sections of the old Roman Dalmatian province became part of the Kingdom of Croatia (925–1102 AD).

Contemporary historian Danijel Dzino states that the 19 century theories of mass movements of people into the old Roman Province of Dalmatia are questionable. Modern Archaeological and Scholarly research seems to be saying that we are looking at much smaller groups of Slavs invading the region. According to historians Florin Curta and Danijel Dzino the term Slavs was first used by outside observers of the day (Greco-Roman) to describe the newcomers. The Slavs used the term to describe themselves at a later stage. Thus began the construct identity of the new arrivals. Later the Slavic peoples started to identify themselves and separated (or were separated by others) into different groups. There was also a good deal of interaction between the groups as shown by DNA studies.

The issue of dates is an interesting one. Historians from the 18th and 19th century place the settlement of the Slavs into the Western Balkans in the 7th century but the more modern research undertaken by scholars and archaeologists[8] cannot confirm this. The arrival and settlement of the Slavs by some has now been thought to be more in the region of the late 8th century or early 9th century.[9][10] According to the Baska tablet from 1100 AD they spoke old Slavic Chakavian. Baska tablet-mp3 [11]

See also

Notes and References

Baska tablet 1100 AD from Baska, on the island of Krk-Croatia.
  1. ^ Becoming Slav, Becoming Croat: New approaches in research of identities in post-Roman Illyricum by Danijel Dzino
    • "The first evidence of the Croat name, dux/rex Croatorum, does not appear until the ninth century. The Charter of Duke Trpimir is indeed the oldest text that mentions the Croat name, dux Chroatorum but its authenticity is disputed for good reason. The earliest certain evidence is the title dux Cruatorum from duke Branimir's inscription (c. 880), so that before this date we cannot assume with certainty that the Croat identity existed at all."
  2. ^ A History of the Croatian Language: by Milan Mogus (p.13)
  3. ^ Becoming Slav, Becoming Croat: Identity Transformations in Post-Roman and and Early Medieval Dalmatia by Danijel Dzino (p.195-p.196)
    • "... region ruled by the dukes Mislav, Domagoj, Zdeslav, and Branimir, to whom is referred in the sources to as principes or duces Sclavorum."
  4. ^ Note: The Sarmatian tribes have been referred to as being Persian in origin (modern: Iranian people).
  5. ^ Two Public Inscriptions from the Greek Colony of Tanais at the Mouth of the Don River on the Sea of Azov by Ante Skegro (p.17)
  6. ^ Vecernji.hr: Preživjeli ledeno doba: Hrvati su prastanovnici Europe (Vecernji.hr: Surviving an Ice Age: the Croats are descendants of prehistoric Europeans)
    • The article reports on the research work (12 years) of: prof. dr. Dragan Primorac, prof. dr. Pavle Rudan, prof. dr. Damir Marjanović, prof. dr. Peter Underhil and prof. dr. Richard Williams. Article released 14.06.2011
  7. ^ Note: Other peoples in the region were Liburnians, Greeks, Celts, Guduscani, Ostrogoths (the last two mentioned are Germanic tribes related to the Goths).
  8. ^ Becoming Slav, Becoming Croat: Identity Transformations in Post-Roman and Early Medieval Dalmatia by Danijel Dzino (p52).
  9. ^ Historians of this school of thought are D. Dzino, L.Margetic, Ancic, Rapanic and Sokol.
  10. ^ Note: The early sources must have reflected the raid activity of the Slavic tribes within Roman Dalmatia.
  11. ^ Note Baska tablet was translated in 1875, it's language is Old Slavic Croatian Chakavian with elements of liturgical Church Slavonic.

External Links

Share this page

<sharethis />

Coat of arms of Croatia (Hrvatska)