Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia Vandalism Study"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎External links: Delinking internal WR, confusing)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Several months ago, a number of Wikipedia Review members joined [[User:MyWikiBiz|Gregory Kohs]] in a project to methodically enumerate one calendar quarter’s worth (4Q 2007) of edit data underlying the 100 Wikipedia articles about the (then) current United States Senators.  What they found was alarming at times. While most vandalized edits were brief in duration and clearly juvenile in content, a substantial portion of edits were plainly intended to be hurtful and defamatory against the Senators — and they lasted for not just minutes, but hours, days, even weeks at a time.
+
Throughout mid-2008, a number of people interested in analysis of Wikipedia joined [[Directory:Gregory J. Kohs|Gregory Kohs]] in a project to methodically enumerate one calendar quarter’s worth (4Q 2007) of edit data underlying the 100 Wikipedia articles about the (then) current [[Directory:United States|United States]] Senators.  [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nsxv8JhN55Szk0pyWT2Tda-0yvbT_hSfGGu4v9xy0nQ/edit?usp=sharing What they found] was alarming at times. While most vandalized edits were brief in duration and clearly juvenile in content, a substantial portion of edits were plainly intended to be hurtful and defamatory against the Senators — and they lasted for not just minutes, but hours, days, even weeks at a time.
  
−
Using the Wikipedia page traffic tool, they attempted to interpolate the number of “page views” that each Senator’s article likely witnessed during the damaged edit. The damaged edit that saw the greatest number of page views before correction regarded Senator John McCain: “McCain was born in Florida in the then American-controlled Panama Canal Zone“, which lasted for over 3 days, under about 93,000 views where nobody noticed or bothered to correct this obvious error.
+
==Topline findings==
  
−
In all, the median duration of a damaged edit was 6 minutes, but the mean duration was 1,440 minutes (exactly 24 hours). These 100 articles were viewed approximately 12.8 million times in the fourth quarter of 2007. Over 378,000 of those views could be considered “damaged”, yielding a 2.96% rate of damaged views. There were about 13.2 million article-minutes during the quarter, and over 901,000 of those article-minutes were in a damaged state — 6.80%.
+
Using the Wikipedia page [http://stats.grok.se/ traffic tool], the team attempted to interpolate the number of “page views” that each Senator’s article likely witnessed during the damaged edit. The damaged edit that saw the greatest number of page views before correction regarded Senator John McCain: "McCain was born in Florida in the then American-controlled Panama Canal Zone", which lasted for over 3 days, under about 93,000 views where nobody noticed or bothered to correct this obvious error.
 +
 
 +
In all, the ''median'' duration of a damaged edit was 6 minutes, but the ''mean'' duration was 1,440 minutes (exactly 24 hours). These 100 articles were viewed approximately 12.8 million times in the fourth quarter of 2007. Over 378,000 of those views could be considered “damaged”, yielding a 2.96% rate of damaged views. There were about 13.2 million article-minutes during the quarter, and over 901,000 of those article-minutes were in a damaged state — 6.80%.
 +
 
 +
This is not an issue of “damaged” versus “acceptable” rates. Rather, it is an issue that the [[Directory:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] allows anonymous editors to append the article about [[Directory:Hillary Clinton|Hillary Clinton]] with “'''hillary needs to die and chop of her penis'''”; or to modify the article about Bob Menendez to say “'''Menendez and Jacobsen have since divorced because he was cheating on her'''”; all without any meaningful effort to change the parameters of editing to disallow this kind of drive-by hatred and libel.  We note that the Wikipedia article about its co-founder, [[Directory:Jimmy Wales|Jimmy Wales]] is kept in a state of "semi-protection", which wards off easily 95% of this sort of vandalism.  Why is this level of protection not extended to all biographies of living persons on Wikipedia?
 +
 
 +
== Notorious examples ==
 +
 
 +
* For over 72 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator John McCain of [[Directory:Arizona|Arizona]] said that he was "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_McCain&diff=166589769&oldid=166526374 born in Florida in the then American-controlled Panama Canal Zone]".  The page was viewed about 93,758 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For nearly 11 hours, the Wikipedia article about McCain said that he "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_McCain&diff=169808394&oldid=169720853 is also know to have sucked a few cocks in his life as well]".  The page was viewed about 14,115 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For more than 75 days, the Wikipedia article about Senator Gordon Smith of [[Directory:Oregon|Oregon]] said that "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gordon_Smith&diff=next&oldid=132039036 political pandering <nowiki>[has]</nowiki> been cited as possible reasons for his unusual positions]".  The page was viewed about 10,029 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For more than 46 days, the Wikipedia article about Senator Maria Cantwell of [[Directory:Washington|Washington]] said that she "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_Cantwell&diff=prev&oldid=160400298 was voted most attractive United States Senator, among current and former members]".  The page was viewed about 7,806 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For over 135 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator Ted Stevens of [[Directory:Alaska|Alaska]] said that he "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ted_Stevens&diff=169950977&oldid=168486242 attended Redondo Union High School, participating in kinky sex adventures.]". The page was viewed about 3,132 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For over 70 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of [[Directory:Texas|Texas]] said that she "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kay_Bailey_Hutchison&diff=next&oldid=160334020 is the only member of the <nowiki>[[Texas Super Justice League]]</nowiki> capable of feeling human emotions.]". The page was viewed about 677 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For over 56 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator Harry Reid of [[Directory:Nevada|Nevada]] said that he was "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Reid&diff=next&oldid=171572544 married to his right hand]". The page was viewed about 1,383 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
* For nearly 11 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator Joe Lieberman of [[Directory:Connecticut|Connecticut]] described him as "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Lieberman&diff=next&oldid=169107698 a hideous, coffee-drinking Jew]". The page was viewed about 446 times in this condition before it was corrected.
 +
 
 +
== Access the complete database ==
 +
More than 700 instances of vandalism were found and recorded into a database.  All of the data is available for analysis in a '''[http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=psAWteTSyixEB98YcV-5VEw Google spreadsheet]''' that is open to the public.
  
−
This is not an issue of “damaged” versus “acceptable” rates. Rather, it is an issue that the Wikimedia Foundation allows anonymous editors to append the article about Hillary Clinton with “hillary needs to die and chop of her penis”; or to modify the article about Bob Menendez to say “Menendez and Jacobsen have since divorced because he was cheating on her”; all without any meaningful effort to change the parameters of editing to disallow this kind of drive-by hatred and libel.
 
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
  
−
* [http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=psAWteTSyixEB98YcV-5VEw Spreadsheet database]
+
* [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nsxv8JhN55Szk0pyWT2Tda-0yvbT_hSfGGu4v9xy0nQ/edit?usp=sharing Spreadsheet database]
 
* [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20565&hl=senators Discussion on ''Wikipedia Review'']
 
* [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20565&hl=senators Discussion on ''Wikipedia Review'']
 
* [http://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/index.php/Chance_News_40#Wikipedia_vandalism_to_U.S._Senators Article within ''Chance News'']
 
* [http://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/index.php/Chance_News_40#Wikipedia_vandalism_to_U.S._Senators Article within ''Chance News'']
 +
* [http://akahele.org/2009/06/wikipedia-goes-to-washington/ Wikipedia Goes to Washington] at ''Akahele.org''
 +
 +
== Notes ==
 +
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 02:11, 4 October 2021

Throughout mid-2008, a number of people interested in analysis of Wikipedia joined Gregory Kohs in a project to methodically enumerate one calendar quarter’s worth (4Q 2007) of edit data underlying the 100 Wikipedia articles about the (then) current United States Senators. What they found was alarming at times. While most vandalized edits were brief in duration and clearly juvenile in content, a substantial portion of edits were plainly intended to be hurtful and defamatory against the Senators — and they lasted for not just minutes, but hours, days, even weeks at a time.

Topline findings

Using the Wikipedia page traffic tool, the team attempted to interpolate the number of “page views” that each Senator’s article likely witnessed during the damaged edit. The damaged edit that saw the greatest number of page views before correction regarded Senator John McCain: "McCain was born in Florida in the then American-controlled Panama Canal Zone", which lasted for over 3 days, under about 93,000 views where nobody noticed or bothered to correct this obvious error.

In all, the median duration of a damaged edit was 6 minutes, but the mean duration was 1,440 minutes (exactly 24 hours). These 100 articles were viewed approximately 12.8 million times in the fourth quarter of 2007. Over 378,000 of those views could be considered “damaged”, yielding a 2.96% rate of damaged views. There were about 13.2 million article-minutes during the quarter, and over 901,000 of those article-minutes were in a damaged state — 6.80%.

This is not an issue of “damaged” versus “acceptable” rates. Rather, it is an issue that the Wikimedia Foundation allows anonymous editors to append the article about Hillary Clinton with “hillary needs to die and chop of her penis”; or to modify the article about Bob Menendez to say “Menendez and Jacobsen have since divorced because he was cheating on her”; all without any meaningful effort to change the parameters of editing to disallow this kind of drive-by hatred and libel. We note that the Wikipedia article about its co-founder, Jimmy Wales is kept in a state of "semi-protection", which wards off easily 95% of this sort of vandalism. Why is this level of protection not extended to all biographies of living persons on Wikipedia?

Notorious examples

  • For over 56 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator Harry Reid of Nevada said that he was "married to his right hand". The page was viewed about 1,383 times in this condition before it was corrected.
  • For nearly 11 hours, the Wikipedia article about Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut described him as "a hideous, coffee-drinking Jew". The page was viewed about 446 times in this condition before it was corrected.

Access the complete database

More than 700 instances of vandalism were found and recorded into a database. All of the data is available for analysis in a Google spreadsheet that is open to the public.


External links

Notes

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia_Vandalism_Study&oldid=480205"