Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Ockham/Summa Logicae/Summa Logicae I 1-7"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 29, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: x) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {| border=1 cellpadding=10 | |
+ | !valign = top width=46%|Latin | ||
+ | !valign = top width=54%|English | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |- valign = top | ||
+ | ||'''Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI''' | ||
+ | || Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general | ||
+ | |- valign = top | ||
+ | |||
+ | || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse". | ||
+ | |||
+ | || All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or disjoined, [expressing] what is the case or is not. | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]] |
Revision as of 17:05, 14 February 2010
Latin | English
|
---|---|
Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI | Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general |
(i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse". | All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in Prior Analytics I, Aristotle says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or disjoined, [expressing] what is the case or is not. |